TITLE	Supreme Court en banc Judgment 2013Da61381 Rendered October 30, 2018¡¼Damages (Others)¡½ [full Text]
Summary
[1] Method of interpretation of a treaty [2] In the case where A, etc., who had been forcibly mobilized during the Imperial Japanese occupation and were put to forced labor at Nippon Steel Corporation, a key military supplier, sought solatium payment against Nippon Steel & Sumitomo Metal Corporation, a newly incorporated company following the dissolution of Nippon Steel Corporation, the Court holds that rights to claim reparations for damages asserted by A, etc. do not fall within the scope of the application of ¡®the Agreement on the Settlement of Problems concerning Property and Claims and on Economic Co-operation between the Republic of Korea and Japan.¡¯

Prev	Supreme Court en banc Decision 2016Do10912 Decided November 1, 2018¡¼Violation of the Military Service Act¡½
Next	Supreme Court en banc Decision 2018Do7172 Decided October 30, 2018 ¡¼Violation of the National Sports Promotion Act (Opening of Gambling Parlors, Etc.); Operation of Gambling Establishment; Violation of the National Sports Promotion Act (Gambling, Etc.); Regular Gambling; Inciting Violation of the Credit Information Use and Protection Act; False Testimony¡½