|
[1] Whether the crime of intimidation requires the victim to have realistically felt fearful (negative)
[2] The case holding that it objectively fell within the notice of harm fearful enough for the other party to feel fearful and a crime of intimidation is consummated regardless of whether the victim realistically felt fearful or not, in the case where a police officer from the Information and Security Department used his position to intimidate the parties of civil disputes to pay their debts as soon as possible by threatening to report it to the supervising department and raise an issue
[3] In a case where a person threatens harm as part of the exercise of right or execution of work, whether it constitutes a crime of intimidation
[4] The case holding that it shall not be regarded as a justifiable execution of work or fair means to achieve the goal, even if that officer meant that execution of work depended on the payment and compensation from the other party, in the case where a police officer from Information and Security Department used his position to intimidate parties of civil disputes to pay their debits as soon as possible by threatening to report it to the supervising department and raise an issue
[5] The meaning of the ""reveal of the investigation data"" under Article 6 (2) of the former Act on the Lapse of Criminal Sentences
|
