º»¹® ¹Ù·Î°¡±â ÁÖ¸Þ´º·Î ¹Ù·Î°¡±â
All
TITLE [Injuction of Prevention of prayer and entrance prohibition]Supreme Court Decision 2007Ma224 Delivered on June 29, 2007 [full Text]
Summary
[1] The method to judge what constitutes church properties, and form of ownership of such church properties (=collective ownership of the Church members) [2] The resolution requirement for a church to leave the religious organization that it belongs to or to change to a different religious organization (=agreement of 2/3 or more of its members with voting rights) who has the burden of proof in proving whether a resolution was made in a legitimate and valid way [3] The case holding that a resolution to leave the existing religious organization is null because even though the general assembly of the members at the church passed such a resolution, a serious flaw in the convening procedure or the method of resolution makes it difficult to know whether the quorum requiring the agreement of the two-thirds of the members with voting rights was met [4] Whether an argument over a pastor or church elder's qualifications after a church disciplinary hearing shall be an appropriate dispute for a court trial (negative in principle), and the case where the Court can examine whether disciplinary punishment from a church hearing was appropriate
Prev [The Third Party's Objection]Supreme Court Decision 2006Da5130 Delivered on June 29, 2007
Next Supreme Court Decision 2005Do3832 Delivered on June 29, 2007
219 Seocho-daero,Seocho-gu,Seoul 06590,Republic of Korea 02-3480-1100