All
| TITLE | [Objection to Disposition of Registration Official]Supreme Court Decision 2006Ma334 Delivered on July 26, 2007 [full Text] |
|---|---|
| Summary | |
| [1] Whether an attorney-at-law shall be deemed a constructive merchant under Article 5 (1) of the Commercial Code (negative) [2] Whether the registration of incorporation of a law firm which shall have its ""name,"" not the ""trade name,"" recorded in its Articles of Incorporation can be deemed identical to the registration of incorporation of a company that shall register the ""trade name,"" under the Commercial Code or the registration of a merchant's trade name (negative) [3] The case holding that a registration official's disposition to dismiss an application for a registration of trade name is just on the ground that an attorney shall not be deemed as a constructive merchant in regards to his job performance, and that there is no need to protect the name of an attorney by the registration of trade name | |
