|
[1] In a case where a driver continued driving the same vehicle for a certain period of time with a blood alcohol level of 0.05% or higher and was tested once for the blood alcohol level, whether such driving under the influence of alcohol (""DUI"") constitutes one inclusive crime (affirmative)
[2] In a case where a person found DUI, who caused the first accident and went on to cause the second accident, was tested for his blood alcohol level after the second accident and a summary order was finalized to the criminal violation of the Road Traffic Act for DUI at the time of the first accident, but he was charged again with the DUI at the time of the second accident, the case held that the latter charge constitutes one inclusive crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act (DUI) as to which the summary order had been already finalized.
|
