º»¹® ¹Ù·Î°¡±â ÁÖ¸Þ´º·Î ¹Ù·Î°¡±â
All
TITLE Supreme Court Decision 2005Do9221 Delivered on July 12, 2007 [full Text]
Summary
[1] In the case where a defrauded victim who did not exercise his credit not knowing the existence of credit, whether such an act is disposal action of the property by inaction (affirmative) [2] In the case where publishing managers paid only partial royalties, by deceiving the sales number to the victim by manipulating the actual publication records, resulting in the author not knowing the existence of the remaining credit, it is held that such an act is a disposal action of property by inaction in fraud.
Prev [Attachment on a Claim and Order of Collection]Supreme Court Decision 2006Ma1277 Delivered on July 12, 2007
Next Supreme Court Decision 2006Do2339 Delivered on July 12, 2007
219 Seocho-daero,Seocho-gu,Seoul 06590,Republic of Korea 02-3480-1100