|
[1] Whether a labor union can give up or suspend the payment of the wages or retirement grants that the specific right to claim the payment has already been originated, through a collective agreement without consent or authorization from the individual workers (negative)
[2] Whether the regulatory effect of a collective agreement affects a person who is not a member of the trade union (negative in principle)
[3] The requirement of the revision of the work regulations against workers
[4] In a case where there is a ground for arguing that an obligation to pay the wages exists, whether an employer has the intent to commit the crime of Articles 112 and 36 of the former Labor Standards Act (negative) and what is the standard for judgment and whether there are any grounds for such an argument
[5] The case holding that when the CEO of a company had significant reasons not to pay bonuses and retirement grants, therefore it shall be hard to affirm that the defendant had the intent to commit a crime of violation as stipulated in Articles 112 and 36 of the former Labor Standards Act
|
