º»¹® ¹Ù·Î°¡±â ÁÖ¸Þ´º·Î ¹Ù·Î°¡±â
All
TITLE [Promised Money]Supreme Court Decision 2005Da32999 Delivered on June 14, 2007 [full Text]
Summary
[1] The meaning of ""assistance"" stipulated in the Article 760 (3) of the Civil Code and whether the assistance to tort by negligence has been established (affirmative) and its constitutional elements [2] In the case of a joint tort, when one tortfeasor was not involved in the tort as deeply as other tortfeasors, whether the scope of that tortfeasor's accountability can be limited (negative) [3] In a case of comparative negligence of a joint tort, the method of assessing the negligence committed by the victim when the ratio of that differs according to each tortfeasor of the joint tort [4] When some of the joint tortfeasors intentionally committed the tort taking advantage of the victim's carelessness, whether it can be interpreted that the fact that some of the joint tortfeasors have such circumstances also prohibits other joint tortfeasors who do not have such circumstances from arguing for comparative negligence (negative)
Prev [Revocation of Disposition of Value Added Tax]Supreme Court Decision 2005Du12718 Delivered on June 14, 2007
Next Supreme Court Decision 2005Du6461 Delivered on June 14, 2007
219 Seocho-daero,Seocho-gu,Seoul 06590,Republic of Korea 02-3480-1100