본문 바로가기 주메뉴로 바로가기
All
TITLE Supreme Court Decision 2021Do13883 Decided March 17, 2022 【Obstruction of Performance of Official Duties (Name of Acknowledged Crime: Assault)】 [full Text]
Summary
【Main Issues and Holdings】 [1] Meaning of “performance of duties” in the crime concerning obstruction of a public official in discharging an official duty Standards for determining whether the performance of a public servant’s duty constitutes “lawful performance of an official duty,” a prerequisite for the crime of obstruction of performance of official duties [2] In the case where: (a) the Defendant went to the city government’s residential livelihood and welfare department office while intoxicated and caused disturbance; (b) when Party A and Party B, city government officials, restrained the Defendant and tried to drag him outside, the Defendant grabbed Party A and Party B by the collar, scuffled with them several times, and slapped Party A in the face by wielding a mobile phone; and (c) the Defendant was accused of obstructing the lawful performance of a city government official’s duties of conducting an exhaustive survey on residential livelihood and welfare and answering civil complaints, the case holding that the Defendant’s act constitutes obstruction of the city government official’s lawful performance of duties and thus constitutes the crime of obstruction of performance of official duties
Prev Supreme Court en banc Decision 2021Da241618 Decided March 24, 2022 【Claim Amounts】
Next Supreme Court Decision 2018Da231550 Decided March 11, 2022 【Judgment of Execution】
219 Seocho-daero,Seocho-gu,Seoul 06590,Republic of Korea 02-3480-1100