본문 바로가기 주메뉴로 바로가기
All
TITLE Supreme Court en banc Order 2015Do10651 Dated November 22, 2018 【Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, Etc., of Specific Economic Crimes (Breach of Trust)】 [full Text]
Summary
For cases requiring the presence of the defense counsel, where an appellate court appoints a public defense counsel, notifies the receipt of the records of trial to the defendant-appellant and his/her defense counsel, and then revokes the appointment of the public defense counsel upon the defendant’s appointment of a private defense counsel, whether the appellate court should send the same notification to the newly appointed private defense counsel (negative), and in such a case, the initial date from which the period for filing a statement of reasons for appeal is calculated (held: the date at which the public defense counsel or the defendant was notified of the receipt of the records of trial)

Whether Article 156-2(3) of the Regulation on Criminal Procedure, which mandates the appellate court to notify a newly appointed public defense counsel of the receipt of the records of trial when the appointment of the previously appointed public defense counsel is revoked within the period for filing a statement of reasons for appeal due to a reason that is not attributable to the defendant, is applicable extensively or by analogy to the case of a newly appointed private defense counsel (negative)
Prev Supreme Court Decision 2018Du41532 Decided November 29, 2018 【Claim for Revocation of Readjudication on Presentation of Comments Regarding Interpretation of Collective Agreement】
Next Supreme Court Decision 2016Da20916 Decided November 15, 2018 【Damages, etc.】
219 Seocho-daero,Seocho-gu,Seoul 06590,Republic of Korea 02-3480-1100