TITLE	Supreme Court Decision 2013Da215843 Decided September 4, 2014¡¼Damages, etc.¡½ [full Text]
Summary
[1] Whether a direct purchaser who bought a commodity directly from an enterpriser which engaged in an unfair collaborative act, and an indirect purchaser who repurchased the commodity or bought a product made out of that commodity from such direct purchaser, can bring a claim for damages against the enterpriser (affirmative in principle), and whether the same reasoning holds true for a sub-subcontractor re-commissioned with a portion of services originally commissioned to another subcontractor by an enterpriser which engaged in an unfair collaborative act (affirmative) [2] Whether the claim for damages under Article 56(1) of the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act is subject to the short-term statutory prescription period under Article 766(1) of the Civil Act (affirmative)

Prev	Supreme Court Decision 2011Da7437 Decided September 4, 2014¡¼Petition for a Cap on Air Polluting Emissions, etc.¡½
Next	Supreme Court Decision 2013Da40858 Decided September 4, 2014¡¼Adjustment of Stock Preemptive Rights Exercise Price¡½