Decisions

All

TITLE	Supreme Court en banc Decision 2008Da42430 Decided September 2, 2011【Injunction against Information Posting, etc.】 [full Text]
Summary
[1] Where an infringement on individual interests by disclosure of personal information without consent conflicts with the legal interest in disclosing such information which is protected as an act of expression, the method of determining the unlawfulness of such disclosure [2] Where an attorney information website operator disclosed the “connection index” calculated based on the attorneys’ personal information, the case holding that the act of providing the connection index was unlawful as a violation of the attorney’s personality right concerning personal information [3] Where an attorney information website operator used case information that was collected via the Supreme Court of Korea’s “My Case Search” service and provided information on the attorney’s success rate or expertise index, etc., the case holding that such act cannot be deemed to infringe on an attorney’s individual interests concerning personal information

TITLE

Supreme Court en banc Decision 2008Da42430 Decided September 2, 2011【Injunction against Information Posting, etc.】 [full Text]

Summary

[1] Where an infringement on individual interests by disclosure of personal information without consent conflicts with the legal interest in disclosing such information which is protected as an act of expression, the method of determining the unlawfulness of such disclosure
[2] Where an attorney information website operator disclosed the “connection index” calculated based on the attorneys’ personal information, the case holding that the act of providing the connection index was unlawful as a violation of the attorney’s personality right concerning personal information
[3] Where an attorney information website operator used case information that was collected via the Supreme Court of Korea’s “My Case Search” service and provided information on the attorney’s success rate or expertise index, etc., the case holding that such act cannot be deemed to infringe on an attorney’s individual interests concerning personal information

Prev	Supreme Court Decision 2010Do17237 Decided September 2, 2011 [Defamation.Obstruction of Business]
Next	Supreme Court Decision 2011Do6507 Decided August 25, 2011 [Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Fraud).Fraud.Uttering of Falsified Private Document]

list