본문 바로가기 주메뉴로 바로가기
All
TITLE Supreme Court Decision 2015Da207747 Decided January 28, 2016【Judgment Execution】 [full Text]
Summary
[1] Purpose of Article 217(1)2 of the Civil Procedure Act
Where a defeated defendant ― even if not having followed the method and procedure of service prescribed in order for a court of justice (forum) to grant the defendant an opportunity to defend himself/herself ― can be deemed to have the opportunity to defend his/her actual interests in a foreign court proceeding, whether the defendant can be seen as having responded to the lawsuit under Article 217(1)2 of the Civil Procedure Act (affirmative)
[2] Method of determining whether the procedure leading to recognition of a foreign court’s final judgment, etc. violates good morals or other social order of the Republic of Korea
Where a foreign court’s final judgment, etc. orders compensatory payment to recover a party’s actual loss, whether recognition can be limited based on Article 217-2(1) of the Civil Procedure Act (negative)
[3] Standard for determining whether requirements for mutual guarantee are satisfied as prescribed under Article 217(1)4 of the Civil Procedure Act
Prev Supreme Court Decision 2015Meu654, 661 Decided February 18, 2016【Marriage Annulment etc., Divorce】
Next Supreme Court Decision 2014Du8896 Decided January 14, 2016【 Revocation of Disposition Imposing Corporate Tax】
219 Seocho-daero,Seocho-gu,Seoul 06590,Republic of Korea 02-3480-1100