본문 바로가기 주메뉴로 바로가기
All
TITLE Supreme Court en banc Decision 2012Meu2888 Decided July 16, 2014【Divorce, etc.】 [full Text]
Summary
[1] In a case where either party of the couple is actually receiving public official’s retirement pension at the time of divorce proceeding, whether the already vested right to retirement pension is subject to property division (affirmative in principle); and if so, whether one possible means to administer the division is for the pension beneficiary spouse to pay the other spouse a pro rata amount of the monthly annuity at regular intervals (affirmative)
[2] In a case involving property division of a public official’s entitlement to retirement pension by means of periodic payment, whether it is possible to assign individual division rate by distinguishing a public official’s retirement pension entitlement from other general properties (affirmative), and the method of computing the proportion of division
Prev Supreme Court Order 2013Ma657 Dated July 21, 2014 【Application for Permission to Inspect and Photocopy Minutes of Board of Directors’ Meeting】
Next Supreme Court en banc Decision 2011Da76402 Decided July 16, 2014【Restitution of Unjust Enrichment】
219 Seocho-daero,Seocho-gu,Seoul 06590,Republic of Korea 02-3480-1100