All
| TITLE | Supreme Court Decision 2014Du8896 Decided January 14, 2016【 Revocation of Disposition Imposing Corporate Tax】 [full Text] |
|---|---|
| Summary | |
|
[1] Meaning and method of determining “actual business management place” under Article 1 subparags. 1 and 3 of the former Corporate Tax Act, which is one of the standards for classifying a domestic corporation and a foreign corporation In case where a corporation, whose actual business management place is based abroad, only carried out specific business activities in the Republic of Korea for a short period, whether the corporation can be deemed as having relocated the actual business management place to the Republic of Korea (negative in principle) [2] Elements to deem that a Singapore corporation’s fixed place of business (also referred to as “permanent establishment”) is located in the Republic of Korea and that it operates the fixed place of business in the Republic of Korea through a dependent agent, and method of determining whether business activities carried out are essential and important In case where a Singapore corporation’s business activities conducted through a fixed place of business or an agent in the Republic of Korea are merely preparatory or auxiliary in nature, whether the Singapore corporation can be seen as operating a deemed permanent establishment through a fixed place of business or a dependent agent in the Republic of Korea (negative) |
|
| Prev | Supreme Court Decision 2015Da207747 Decided January 28, 2016【Judgment Execution】 |
|---|---|
| Next | Supreme Court Order 2014Ma1157 Dated December 29, 2015【Rehabilitation】 |


