All
| TITLE | Supreme Court Decision 2015Du52098 Decided August 30, 2016【Revocation of Disposition Imposing Tariff, etc.】 [full Text] |
|---|---|
| Summary | |
|
[1] Standard for determining whether the amount a purchaser paid to a trademark holder constitutes “payment for the use of trademark right and other rights similar thereto,” which forms the basis for adding or adjusting the dutiable value of imported goods [2] In a case where: (a) a sportswear importer (“Company A”) concluded a license agreement to pay royalties and international marketing fees with a company based in Germany (“Company B”), holder of the trademark attached to the sportswear, etc. to be imported by Company A; (b) subsequently, reported the dutiable value of imported goods without adding the international marketing fees when importing the sportswear, etc. with Company B’s trademark attached; and (c) the competent customs office accordingly rendered a disposition of imposing customs duty (tariff) by adding the international marketing fees to the dutiable value, the case holding that deeming the international marketing fee to constitute a “payment for the use of trademark right and other rights similar thereto” accords with the substantive transaction |
|
| Prev | Supreme Court Decision 2015Da255265 Decided August 30, 2016【Building Evacuation】 |
|---|---|
| Next | Supreme Court Decision 2016Hu878 Decided August 29, 2016【Affirmation of the Scope of Right (Design)】 |


