본문 바로가기 주메뉴로 바로가기
All
TITLE Supreme Court Decision 2015Du52098 Decided August 30, 2016【Revocation of Disposition Imposing Tariff, etc.】 [full Text]
Summary
[1] Standard for determining whether the amount a purchaser paid to a trademark holder constitutes “payment for the use of trademark right and other rights similar thereto,” which forms the basis for adding or adjusting the dutiable value of imported goods
[2] In a case where: (a) a sportswear importer (“Company A”) concluded a license agreement to pay royalties and international marketing fees with a company based in Germany (“Company B”), holder of the trademark attached to the sportswear, etc. to be imported by Company A; (b) subsequently, reported the dutiable value of imported goods without adding the international marketing fees when importing the sportswear, etc. with Company B’s trademark attached; and (c) the competent customs office accordingly rendered a disposition of imposing customs duty (tariff) by adding the international marketing fees to the dutiable value, the case holding that deeming the international marketing fee to constitute a “payment for the use of trademark right and other rights similar thereto” accords with the substantive transaction
Prev Supreme Court Decision 2015Da255265 Decided August 30, 2016【Building Evacuation】
Next Supreme Court Decision 2016Hu878 Decided August 29, 2016【Affirmation of the Scope of Right (Design)】
219 Seocho-daero,Seocho-gu,Seoul 06590,Republic of Korea 02-3480-1100