TITLE	Supreme Court Decision 2014Hu614 Decided June 9, 2016¡¼Registration Invalidation (Design)¡½ [full Text]
Summary
[1] Purport of Article 5(2) of the former Design Act [2] In the case where: (a) Company A petitioned for adjudication on registration invalidation against B, the holder of rights to the registered design as applied to an article described as ¡°synthetic foam plank for drawing board¡±; and (b) the Intellectual Property Trial and Appeal Board (IPTAB) rendered an adjudication dismissing Company A¡¯s petition, the case holding that the registered design constitutes a design that could have been easily created by a person who has ordinary skill in the art to which the design pertains by applying a pattern of granite, etc., which is a well-known form of natural material

Prev	Supreme Court Decision 2014Du39784 Decided June 10, 2016¡¼Revocation of Rejection of a Petition for Correction of Corporate (Withholding) Tax¡½
Next	Supreme Court Decision 2014Da67614 Decided May 27, 2016¡¼Damages, etc.¡½