º»¹® ¹Ù·Î°¡±â ÁÖ¸Þ´º·Î ¹Ù·Î°¡±â
All
TITLE [Damages]Seoul Central District Court Decision 2006Gahap22338, 38197 Decided May 31, 2007 [full Text]
Summary
[1] The case holding that a game service provider does not have a duty to verify identity during the approval process of a member joining application as to whether an applicant is the person who matches with a real name information holder, where the third party applies for member joining to online game service by stealing other person's identity [2] The meaning of ""aiding and abetting"" under Article 760 (3) of the Civil Act and whether a negligent aiding and abetting of torts are actionable (affirmative) [3] The degree of online game service provider's duty of care to block other's identity theft and the method of determining a violation of such duty of care [4] The case rejecting tort liability from aiding and abetting identity theft on the ground that the game service provider fulfilled its duty of care to prevent a member from joining and from using act by identity theft in light of total circumstances, where the third party joined as member of Massive Multiplayer Online Role-Playing Game service by stealing other's identity
Prev Supreme Court Decision 2006Do1813 Delivered on June 1, 2007
Next Supreme Court Decision 2007Do1903 Delivered on May 31, 2007
219 Seocho-daero,Seocho-gu,Seoul 06590,Republic of Korea 02-3480-1100