All
| TITLE | Supreme Court en banc Decision 2010Do10500 Decided February 21, 2013¡¼Embezzlement¡½ [full Text] |
|---|---|
| Summary | |
|
[1] Whether a subsequent disposal constitutes a separate crime of embezzlement, following the completion of the crime of embezzlement by a preceding disposal; whether it constitutes a separate embezzlement for a custodian of another¡¯s real property to set up a separate collateral on the same real property or sell the real property after the act of embezzlement becomes complete by registering a collateral on the said real property (affirmative in principle) [2] Where Defendant B, with custody of the victim family clan A¡¯s land under title trust, set up a collateral on said land for a loan to repay his/her personal debt, and subsequently Defendants B and C conspired to sell the land to D, the case affirming the judgment below holding the land sale as constituting a separate embezzlement |
|
| Prev | Supreme Court Decision 2011Da36848 Decided February 28, 2013 ¡¼Damages¡½ |
|---|---|
| Next | Supreme Court Decision 2011Do5835 Decided February 15, 2013¡¼Violation of the Copyright Act¡½ |


