TITLE	Supreme Court Decision 2009Da104960, 104977 Decided March 27, 2014¡¼Registration of Ownership Transfer¤ýUnfair Profit Return¡½ [full Text]
Summary
[1] Whether a conciliation protocol¡¯s invalidity alleged on grounds that the effect of the conciliation protocol (i.e., identical as a finalized judgment) and the content of the protocol contradicts compulsory provisions (negative in principle), and whether such an effect extends to ¡°a legal relationship where the intervenor is a party¡± included in the protocol (affirmative) [2] In a case where the portion of a primary and conjunctive claim regarding the primary defendant is not granted, whether a lawsuit may be filed by combining the purpose of petitioning to grant the claim on the conjunctive defendant, which cannot co-exist with the primary claim due to the legal relationship (affirmative) [3] In a primary and conjunctive co-litigation, whether rendering a judgment for partial litigants or remaining litigants is permissible (negative), and the subject matter of the judgment in a case where either the primary or the conjunctive co-litigant filed an appeal

Prev	Supreme Court Decision 2013Da91597 Decided March 27, 2014¡¼Damages¡½
Next	Supreme Court en banc Decision 2012Hu4162 Decided March 20, 2014¡¼Confirmation of Scope of Rights (Utility Model)¡½