º»¹® ¹Ù·Î°¡±â ÁÖ¸Þ´º·Î ¹Ù·Î°¡±â
All
TITLE Supreme Court Decision 2010Do1422 Decided February 23, 2012 [Violation of the Computer Program Protection Act, Obstruction of Business] [full Text]
Summary
[1] The meaning of ""technical protection measures"" under the former Computer Program Protection Act and whether technical measures merely controlling access to the computer program work constitute technical protection measures (negative) [2] In case where Defendants were charged with violation of the former Computer Program Protection Act by incapacitating technical protection measures of the replacement driving service program developed and registered by Gap corporation, the case affirming the judgment below which acquitted Defendants on the ground that all of Gap corporation's technical measures merely constitute access control measures which can not be seen as ""technical protection measures"" under Article 30 of the same Act
Prev Supreme Court Decision 2011Do8124, 2011Jeondo141 Decided February 23, 2012[Violation of the Special Act on the Punishment of Sexual Crimes (Rape of Minors less than 13 Years of Age, etc.),Violation of
Next Supreme Court Decision 2010Da83700 Decided February 23, 2012[Damages]
219 Seocho-daero,Seocho-gu,Seoul 06590,Republic of Korea 02-3480-1100