All
| TITLE | Supreme Court Decision 2010Do1422 Decided February 23, 2012 [Violation of the Computer Program Protection Act, Obstruction of Business] [full Text] |
|---|---|
| Summary | |
| [1] The meaning of ""technical protection measures"" under the former Computer Program Protection Act and whether technical measures merely controlling access to the computer program work constitute technical protection measures (negative) [2] In case where Defendants were charged with violation of the former Computer Program Protection Act by incapacitating technical protection measures of the replacement driving service program developed and registered by Gap corporation, the case affirming the judgment below which acquitted Defendants on the ground that all of Gap corporation's technical measures merely constitute access control measures which can not be seen as ""technical protection measures"" under Article 30 of the same Act | |


