All
| TITLE | Supreme Court Decision 2013Chu67 Decided February 13, 2014¡¼Confirmation of Invalidity of Re-Approval of Municipal Ordinance Bill¡½ [full Text] |
|---|---|
| Summary | |
| In a case where the Head of Gu (sub-division of a city) demanded reconsideration of a Municipal Ordinance Bill which required the disclosure of wasteful budget uses and imposed a cap on the payment of budgetary performance bonus, on the ground that the Bill violated the Local Autonomy Act, but the Gu Council decided to pass the Bill as originally proposed, the case holding that the Bill may not be deemed an inherent infringement on a local government head¡¯s authority over budget execution and the payment of budgetary performance bonus | |


