All
| TITLE | Supreme Court Decision 2010Da57497 Decided January 12, 2012[Damages] [full Text] |
|---|---|
| Summary | |
| [1] In case where Gap corporation ceased selling the service of MP3 file downloads and offer of a music score composed by Eul at its music site upon Eul's copyright infringement interruption request but the former purchasing users of the above service were allowed to continue to use the service, the case holding that it is deemed as the infringement of Eul's public transmission right or forwarding right, separately from the transmission right infringement by the act done prior to the interruption of the sales,offer of the service; but Eul's other reproduction right can not be said to be infringed [2] The case reversing the judgment below holding that Gap company's lyrics viewing service did not infringe Eul's right of attribution, in the case where Gap corporation offered the MP3 file download and sample listening services for composer Eul's music work at its music site without stating a composer name and stated it falsely as ""non-party"" in the lyrics viewing service, on the ground that the above acts infringed Eul's right of attribution | |
