|
[1] Whether the causal relationship between a medical malpractice and the result is presumed, in a case where the victim proves that medical malpractice was committed in a series of medical care, and that no other cause could have intervened in the result than the medical care (affirmative)
[2] In a case where multiple doctors were involved in medical care and where it is not clear who actually caused the medical accident, whether all of the doctors involved in the series of medical care should be held liable to compensate as joint tortfeasors (affirmative)
[3] In a case where a victim's damage caused by an injury in an industrial accident escalates because of a medical accident during treatment, whether the proximate casual relationship between damage and industrial accident can be found (affirmative)
|