TITLE	Supreme Court Decision 2012Meu66, 73 Decided February 15, 2013¡¼Divorce, Designation of Parental Right Holder and Custody Holder, Delivery of Child¡½ [full Text]
Summary
[1] The standard for finding a ¡°mutual guarantee¡± as required under Article 217 subparag. 4 of the Civil Procedure Act [2] In case where Gap filed a divorce lawsuit against Eul at a court in Oregon, U.S.A., which resulted in the final judgment; and the issue is whether the U.S. judgment satisfies a ¡°mutual guarantee¡± element for the recognition of a foreign judgment, the case affirming the judgment below that the U.S. judgment satisfied a mutual guarantee element on the grounds that the recognition elements of Oregon do not demand more than the Korean Civil Procedure Act and do not differ substantially in major points

Prev	Supreme Court Decision 2011Do5835 Decided February 15, 2013¡¼Violation of the Copyright Act¡½
Next	Supreme Court Decision 2010Da103185 Decided February, 14, 2013¡¼Damages¡½