TITLE	Supreme Court Decision 2015Du36485 Decided May 30, 2019 ¡¼Claim for Revocation of Disposition Suspending Deferment of Payment of Treatment Fee¡½ [full Text]
Summary
In a case where: (a) Party A, a qualified and licensed medical practitioner, established a health care institution pursuant to the Medical Service Act and provided medical care benefits to those covered by the National Health Insurance Service and their dependents; (b) however, the pertinent health care institution was in fact established and operated by a medical specialist who is the head of another medical institution; or (c) Party A established the pertinent health care institution under the name of other medical specialists, thereby breaching the Medical Service Act, whether the pertinent circumstances alone can serve as sufficient grounds for refusing the payment of the health care benefits or recovering the considerable amount of the health care benefits received (negative)

Prev

Supreme Court Decision 2015Do863 Decided May 30, 2019¡¼Aiding and Abetting Violation of the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, Etc. (Distribution of Obscene Materials); Violation of the Youth Protection Act; Aiding and Abetting Violation of the Act on the Protection of Children and Youth Against Sex Offenses (Production, Distribution, etc. of Obscene Materials) [Name of Ancillary Offense: Aiding and Abetting Violation of the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection (Distribution of Obscene Materials)]; Violation of the Act on the Protection of Children and Youth Against Sex Offenses (Production, Distribution, etc. of Obscene Materials) [Name of Ancillary Offense: Violation of the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, Etc. (Distribution of Obscene Materials)]¡½

Next

Supreme Court Decision 2018Du36110 Decided May 16, 2019 ¡¼Revocation of Disposition Imposing Corporate Tax¡½