TITLE	Supreme Court en banc Decision 2019Du52386 Decided February 20, 2020 ¡¼Revocation of Readjudication on Relief Request for Unfair Dismissal¡½ [full Text]
Summary
[1] In the case where it becomes impossible for a worker to be reinstated in his/her former office due to the causes, such as reaching the retirement age or the expiration of a labor contract while he/she is contending for the effect of dismissal through the relief request for unfair dismissal, but he/she needs to be paid the amount of wages during the period of dismissal, whether there exist interests in litigation contending for the decision made by the reexamination of the Central Labor Relations Commission, which dismissed the relief request (affirmative) Whether the aforementioned legal doctrine is likewise applicable in the case where a worker files an order for the payment of money or valuables in accordance with Article 30(3) of the Labor Standards Act (affirmative)

Prev

Supreme Court en banc Decision 2019Do9756 Decided February 20, 2020 ¡¼Fraud and Breach of Trust¡½

Next

Supreme Court Decision 2019Do5186 Decided February 13, 2020 ¡¼Abuse of Authority and Obstruction of Exercise of Rights; Violation of State Public Officials Act; Violation of the Public Official Election Act; Coercion; Perjury; Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bribery); Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Loss of National Treasury)¡½