º»¹® ¹Ù·Î°¡±â ÁÖ¸Þ´º·Î ¹Ù·Î°¡±â
All
TITLE Supreme Court en banc Decision 2012Meu2888 Decided July 16, 2014¡¼Divorce, etc.¡½ [full Text]
Summary
[1] In a case where either party of the couple is actually receiving public official¡¯s retirement pension at the time of divorce proceeding, whether the already vested right to retirement pension is subject to property division (affirmative in principle); and if so, whether one possible means to administer the division is for the pension beneficiary spouse to pay the other spouse a pro rata amount of the monthly annuity at regular intervals (affirmative)
[2] In a case involving property division of a public official¡¯s entitlement to retirement pension by means of periodic payment, whether it is possible to assign individual division rate by distinguishing a public official¡¯s retirement pension entitlement from other general properties (affirmative), and the method of computing the proportion of division
Prev Supreme Court Order 2013Ma657 Dated July 21, 2014 ¡¼Application for Permission to Inspect and Photocopy Minutes of Board of Directors¡¯ Meeting¡½
Next Supreme Court en banc Decision 2011Da76402 Decided July 16, 2014¡¼Restitution of Unjust Enrichment¡½
219 Seocho-daero,Seocho-gu,Seoul 06590,Republic of Korea 02-3480-1100