All
| TITLE | Supreme Court Decision 2010Du18758 Decided October 11, 2012[Cancellation of Information Non-disclosure Measure] [full Text] |
|---|---|
| Summary | |
| [1] The meaning of the ""information pertaining to matters such as audit, supervision, inspection, tests, regulations, tendering contract, the development of technology, the management of personnel affairs, decision-making processes and internal-review processes, etc., which if disclosed, carries a reasonable possibility of seriously impeding the proper performance of work as well as research and development"" as provided by Article 9 (1) subparagraph 5 of the Official Information Disclosure Act, and the standards in determining such information [2] In a case where plaintiff Gap requested information disclosure of the reports submitted by police officers during an internal audit following a dereliction of duty accusation, to which the district police chief responded by determining the report as ""information subject to non-disclosure"" in accordance with Article 9 (1) subparagraph 5 of the Official Information Disclosure Act; the case holding that the judgment below (which held that the aforementioned report does not qualify as ""information subject to non-disclosure"" in accordance with Article 9 (1) subparagraph 5 of the Official Information Disclosure Act) had errors in misapprehension of the legal principle regarding ""information subject to non-disclosure"" | |
