TITLE	Supreme Court Decision 2011Hu1982 Decided Nov. 15, 2012 [Invalidity of Registration (Trademark)] [full Text]
Summary
[1] Where the already acquired distinguishability of a registered trademark is not extinguished, whether the registered trademark as a whole maintains distinguishability, if it is a combination of part which already acquired distinguishability from a long-term use and other parts(affirmative), and whether the above legal principle applies also to the case of a service mark (affirmative) [2] Where Gap University and Industry Cooperation foundation filed a registration invalidation trial against Eul Educational Institute, Inc., the registration right holder of registered service mark "" ,"" on the ground that the registered service mark constitutes Article 6(1)4 and 7 of the Trademark Act, the case holding the judgment below erred by misapprehending the legal principle since the registered service mark cannot be seen as indistinguishable from others

Prev	Supreme Court en banc Decision 2010Du17564 Decided November 22, 2012¡¼Revocation of Disposition Denying Claim for Correction of Corporate Tax¡½
Next	Supreme Court Decision 2011Do15258 decided November 15, 2012[Violation of the Road Traffic Act (Driving under the influence)]