º»¹® ¹Ù·Î°¡±â ÁÖ¸Þ´º·Î ¹Ù·Î°¡±â
All
TITLE Supreme Court Decision 2014Da220347 Decided January 25, 2017 ¡¼Claim for Compensation for Employee¡¯s Invention¡½ [full Text]
Summary
[1] Meaning of ¡°benefits to be realized by an employer¡± that should be considered when determining the amount of compensation for an employee¡¯s invention as prescribed under Article 40(2) of the former Patent Act
Where benefits derived from a product manufactured and sold by an employer can be assessed as the employer¡¯s benefits accruing from an employee¡¯s invention, even though the product does not fall under the scope of right to an employee¡¯s invention
[2] In cases where grounds exist for invalidating a patent regarding an employee¡¯s invention, whether compensation for an employee¡¯s invention is nullified by uniformly denying the existence of exclusive benefits accruing from a patent (negative in principle), and whether the grounds for invalidation can be taken into consideration when calculating the exclusive benefits accruing therefrom (affirmative)
Prev Supreme Court Decision 2015Da59146 Decided January 25, 2017 ¡¼Severance Pay, etc.¡½
Next Supreme Court en banc Decision 2013Da17292 Decided January 19, 2017 ¡¼Removal, etc. of Graveyard¡½
219 Seocho-daero,Seocho-gu,Seoul 06590,Republic of Korea 02-3480-1100