All
| TITLE | Supreme Court Decision 2009Do591 Decided June 9, 2011 [Special Obstruction of Performance of Official Duties.Bodily Injury (Convicted Crimes: Obstruction of Performance of Official Duties.Bodily Injur [full Text] |
|---|---|
| Summary | |
| [1] The test for determining whether an outdoor assembly or demonstration is subject to a dispersion order as being not identical to the submitted report because of the deviation from the reported scope, or constituting ""an act obviously exceeding the bounds of the reported scope"" [2] The elements to acknowledge a lawful report pursuant to the proviso of Article 6 (1) of the Assembly and Demonstration Act, in case where the places of outdoor assembly or demonstration cover jurisdictions of more than two regional police agencies [3] In case where the defendant reported an outdoor assembly (demonstration march) to the commissioner of Busan regional police agency stating that ""departing from Busan and walking to Seoul for demonstration,"" and s/he was charged with obstruction of the performance of official duties by injuring police officers who tried to disperse the demonstration during the above reported march, the case holding that the judgment below that the above act constitutes the crime of obstruction of performance of official duties is erroneous in the misapprehension of legal principle, etc. | |
