All
| TITLE | Supreme Court Decision 2010Do15724 Decided February 24, 2011[Violation of the Foreign Trade Act] [full Text] |
|---|---|
| Summary | |
| [1] The meaning of ""goods with improper indication of origin"" under Article 5-3, and ""goods omitting indication of origin"" under Article 5-4, of the Notification about Operation of the System for Indication of Origin applied per delegation of Article 33 (1), (2) of the former Foreign Trade Act and Article 56 (3) of the Enforcement Decree of the same Act [2] The case finding the judgment of the court below erroneous, which had previously determined that the defendants, as traders, had failed to indicate the origin of the automobile parts they had imported from China on the product itself, but had made such indication on the individual packaging boxes, and thus could not be seen as ""omitting indication of origin"" prescribed under Article 33 (3) of the former Foreign Trade Act | |


