TITLE	Supreme Court Decision 2009Du4159 Decided April 14, 2011 [Revocation of Correction Order and Penalty Surcharge Payment Order] [full Text]
Summary
[1] In case where banks including Gap bank, etc. newly established the banker's usance acceptance fee successively in response to the Financial Supervisory Service's request for a change in the accounting system for the banker's usance transaction, the case holding that the above act constitutes an unfair collusion under Article 19 (1) 1 of the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act [2] Elements for determining whether some or all enterprisers which participated in an unfair collusion under Article 19 (1) 1 of the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act has terminated the unfair collusion

Prev	Supreme Court Decision 2010Da103642 Decided April 14, 2011 [Objection to Distribution]
Next	Supreme Court Decision 2010Do5605 Decided April 14, 2011 [Violation of the Act on Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Acceptance of Property, etc.).Violation of the Act on Aggrava