TITLE	[Revocation of Disposition Imposing Expenses Assigned to Person Causing Such Expenses]Supreme Court en banc Decision 2007Du6342 Decided March 20, 2008 [full Text]
Summary
[1] Whether the existence of a direct remedy, such as enforcement proceedings under the presumption of nullity of an administrative disposition, should be considered in determining whether the ""legal interests seeking affirmation of nullity"" under Article 35 of the Administrative Litigation Act exist (negative) [2] In a case where a project implementer, as the person who installed the drain facilities (""other actor""), bears the construction expenses for public sewerage caused by the other act in accordance with Article 32 (2) of the former Sewerage Act, whether expenses assigned to the person causing sewerage under Article 32 (4) of the same Act can also be imposed separately from the above (negative) and the meaning of ""quantities of sewerage"" in the base or implementation plan report of the project qualifying as the other act

Prev	[Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes(Taxation)..]Supreme Court Decision 2008Do680 Delivered on March 27, 2008
Next	[Violation of the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, etc. (Distribution of Lewd Materials, etc.)]Supreme Court Decision 2006Do3558 Deli