TITLE	Supreme Court Decision 2013Da212066 Decided March 27, 2014¡¼Damages¡½ [full Text]
Summary
[1] The purport of prohibiting an act that induces customers by offering unfair benefit under Article 23(1)3 of the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act and Article 36(1) [Attachment Table 1-2] 4(a) of the Enforcement Decree of the same Act, and the standards by which to determine unlawfulness of inducing competitors¡¯ customers [2] Where Company A advertised by using the phrase ¡°no need to rely on expensive imported cosmetics; contains 80% fermented liquid yeast,¡± upon launching a new fermented essence product, and held an event of offering regular-sized fermented essence in exchange for Company B¡¯s empty fermented essence bottle, the case holding that the court below rendered the above advertisement and event do not constitute an ¡°act of inducement by unfair benefit¡±

Prev	Supreme Court Decision 2011Du6998 Decided April 10, 2014¡¼Revocation of Disposition Rejecting a Trade Union Establishment Report¡½
Next	Supreme Court Decision 2013Da91597 Decided March 27, 2014¡¼Damages¡½