TITLE	Supreme Court Decision 2008Do7724 Decided March 10, 2011[Violation of the Immigration Control Act] [full Text]
Summary
[1] Whether an investigation is to be deemed unlawful retrospectively in case where a general judicial police officer conducts an investigation before a complaint or accusation is filed against an immigration offender by the head of the immigration control office or others (negative in principle) [2] Whether an investigation is to be deemed unlawful retrospectively in case where a general judicial police officer conducts an investigation without delivering a person violating immigration law to the head of the immigration control office or others who have exclusive indictment authority (negative) [3] A case affirming the judgment below, that held that the Provincial Police Agency's investigation did not render the investigations conducted by the Provincial Police Agency and the prosecutor's office unlawful or a violation of the indictment procedures or otherwise invalid against the law just because it conducted the investigation without a due accusation being filed or without promptly delivering the case to the head of the immigration control office, in case where the defendant was indicted due to a violation of the former Immigration Control Act for hiring foreigners without a status of sojourn

Prev	Supreme Court Decision 2009Du23617, 23624 Decided March 10, 2011 [Revocation of Disposition for Decision upon Tax Investigation.Revocation of Disposition to Impose Composite Income Tax, Etc.]
Next	Supreme Court Decision 2007Du21587 Decided February 24, 2011 [Revocation of Disposition to Impose Corporate Tax, Etc.]