TITLE	Supreme Court Decision 2012Da44969 Decided April 11, 2013 ¡¼Damages¡½ [full Text]
Summary
[1] Whether an act jointly related to occurrence of damage from a tort such as acquisition of stolen goods by embezzlement is to be recognized as a joint tort (affirmative) [2] Where Eul and others having Gap corporation¡¯s management rights as representative directors formed a contract to sell Gap company¡¯s stocks with management rights to Byung who has no particular asset, and after the above contract formation, Byung offered certificate of deposit issued with Gap company funds as security to private lender Jung, although Jung did not conspire with Byung for embezzlement, since Byung¡¯s embezzlement and Jung¡¯s CD acquisition constitute objectively related joint act, the Court held that the contrary judgment below erred in misapprehending legal principle

Prev	Supreme Court en banc Order 2011Chogi689 Dated April 18, 2013 ¡¼Criminal Compensation¡½
Next	Supreme Court Decision 2011Hu835 Decided March 28, 2013 ¡¼Invalidation (Trademark)¡½