All
| TITLE | Supreme Court Decision 2012Hu740 Decided July 12, 2012[Registration Cancellation (Trademark)] [full Text] |
|---|---|
| Summary | |
| [1] The trademark user(=in principle, the client) in the case of export through an original equipment manufacturer (OEM) in accordance with Article 73 (1)-3 of the Trademark Act [2] The case holding that in a case where Gap et al requested a cancellation trial of the registered trademark "" [ see text ] "" against licensee Eul on grounds of Article 73 (1)-3 of the Trademark Act; the judgment below which found reasons for trademark extinguishment based on the fact that the exporter is not a non-exclusive licensee without hearing on whether the client of an OEM is the non-exclusive licensee had errors in the misapprehension of legal principles | |


