All
| TITLE | Supreme Court Decision 2012Do16001 Decided June 13, 2013¡¼Violation of the Public Official Election Act¡½ [full Text] |
|---|---|
| Summary | |
|
[1] Admissibility of documentary evidence printed from digital storage devices [2] Whether a case where a defendant refuses to testify in reply to the prosecutor¡¯s question on the authenticity of the defendant¡¯s evidence document by exercising the right to remain silent constitutes a situation where a defendant is ¡°unable to make statements due to any other cause¡± in accordance with Article 314 of the Criminal Procedure Act (negative) [3] In a case where a document recording a statement becomes hearsay evidence when the authenticity of its contents is used as direct evidence against a crime, whether the document always becomes hearsay evidence for the very fact that the statement was made, or when it is used as circumstantial evidence for an indirect fact unrelated to the authenticity of the statement (negative) |
|


