TITLE	Supreme Court Decision 2013Da91597 Decided March 27, 2014¡¼Damages¡½ [full Text]
Summary
[1] Whether aiding and abetting by negligence is acknowledged in the civil law area (affirmative) and the criteria to determine whether reasonable causation exists between aiding and abetting by negligence and the occurrence of loss [2] In a case where a certified realtor ¡°A¡± et al., who acted as the real estate agents of ¡°B¡± for the purchase of land share, did not even check the copy of real estate register and failed to inform B about the ongoing auction of the land despite a duty of care to examine the rights-holder¡¯s relationship or situation of the land, the case finding their action to constitute aiding and abetting by negligence the tort of ¡°C,¡± the seller, yet holding that A et al.¡¯s tort liability may not be found from the said aiding and abetting

Prev	Supreme Court Decision 2013Da212066 Decided March 27, 2014¡¼Damages¡½
Next	Supreme Court Decision 2009Da104960, 104977 Decided March 27, 2014¡¼Registration of Ownership Transfer¤ýUnfair Profit Return¡½