TITLE	Supreme Court en banc Decision 2009Do6788 Decided May 17, 2012¡¼Violation of the Framework Act on the Construction Industry¤ýBribery¤ýViolation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes¡½ [full Text]
Summary
[1] Where a witness legitimately exercised the right to refuse to testify pursuant to the Criminal Procedure Act, whether it constitutes ¡°being unable to make a statement in a preparatory hearing due to death, illness, foreign residency, unknown whereabouts, or any other similar cause¡± under Article 314 of the aforementioned Act (negative) [2] Where Company A and its employees (¡°Defendants¡±) provided money to an executive of a company specializing in rebuilding projects while soliciting a redevelopment contract, and were subsequently prosecuted for violating the Framework Act on the Construction Industry, the Defendants declined to offer into evidence a ¡°legal opinion¡± written and sent to Company A by an attorney, and the attorney refused to testify on the legal opinion, the case holding that denying the admissibility of the legal opinion and acknowledging acquittal was justifiable

Prev	Supreme Court Decision 2012Do1284 decided May 24, 2012 [Violation of Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (Formation of organization, etc., and activities), violation of Enforcement Decree of the Act...
Next	Supreme Court Decision 2010Da15660 decided May 10, 2012[Damages (Other)] [Gong2012Sang,974]