TITLE	Supreme Court Decision 2011Do15258 decided November 15, 2012[Violation of the Road Traffic Act (Driving under the influence)] [full Text]
Summary
[1] Whether a blood alcohol level test result using blood samples collected without a warrant or permission for appraisal is admissible as evidence (negative in principle), and whether the evidence still remains inadmissible if the defendant et al has consented (affirmative) [2] The legal nature of forced collection of blood (=the necessary measures for conducting blood tests, or execution of seizure warrant) [3] In a case where an unconscious driver caused a traffic accident while driving under the influence and was transported to the hospital; whether the investigative body may subject the driver to forced blood collection without a warrant (affirmative with restriction), and whether acquiring a seizure warrant after the event is necessary (affirmative)

Prev	Supreme Court Decision 2011Hu1982 Decided Nov. 15, 2012 [Invalidity of Registration (Trademark)]
Next	Supreme Court Decision 2012Do6676 Decided November 15, 2012 [Employee's Breach of Trust.Violation of the Unfair Competition Prevention and Trade Secret Protection Act.Employee's Embezzlement]