All
| TITLE | Supreme Court Decision 2012Do6079 Decided Sep. 27, 2012 [Violation(Bribe) of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes(Alternative Crimes of Defendants 5,6,7:False Official Documen [full Text] |
|---|---|
| Summary | |
| [1] Whether an act of depositing criminal proceeds, etc. to the other person's account constitutes ""an act disguising the fact about acquisition or disposition of criminal proceeds"" under Article 3(1)1 of the Act on Regulation of Punishment of Criminal Proceeds Concealment (affirmative) and the number of crimes between the crime of violation of Article 3(1)1 of the same Act and the crime of violation (bribe) of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (=real concurrent crimes) [2] The case affirming the judgment below holding that in a case where Defendant Gap who had worked in the life order division of the 00 police station was prosecuted for disguising the acquisition of criminal proceeds where he received a bribe from Defendant Eul; Defendant Eul got issued a cash card based on his son's bank account; Defendant Eul deposited to the above account; and Defendant Gap withdrew cash using the cash card, the crime of violation of the Act on Regulation of Punishment of Criminal Proceeds Concealment and the crime of violation(bribe) of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes are established and two crimes stand in relation of real concurrent crimes | |
