TITLE	Supreme Court en banc Decision 2018Do13945 Decided November 21, 2019¡¼Violation of the Narcotics Control Act (Psychotropic Drugs)¡½ [full Text]
Summary
In a case where a witness who made a statement at an investigative institution refused to testify in court, and thus a criminal defendant did not cross-examine, but the witness did not legitimately exercise the right to refuse to testify, whether the case may correspond to ¡°when a person is unable to make a statement because there is any other similar cause¡± stipulated in Article 314 of the Criminal Procedure Act (negative in principle) and whether the documents containing the statement of witnesses recorded by the investigative institution may have admissibility of evidence (negative)

Prev	Supreme Court en banc Decision 2015Du49474 Decided November 21, 2019¡¼Revocation of Sanction Orders¡½
Next	Supreme Court en banc Order 2014Seu44, 45 Dated November 21, 2019¡¼Division of Inherited Property; Division of Inherited Property¡½