All
| TITLE | Supreme Court Decision 2017Da258237 Decided September 10, 2019¡¼Contractual Amount¡½ [full Text] |
|---|---|
| Summary | |
|
[1] Significance of an exclusive management agreement and standard for determining its legal nature [2] In a case where Party A, an entertainer, concluded an exclusive agreement with Party B in which she delegated management tasks relating to her entertainment career to Party B and thereafter rescinded the exclusive agreement on the ground of a breach of fiduciary relationship, the case holding that the legal nature of the foregoing exclusive agreement constitutes an innominate contract that is akin to mandate, and that Party A may rescind the exclusive agreement upon termination of the mutual fiduciary relationship between the contracting parties [3] Exceptional circumstances where the court is obliged to resume argument upon filing of an application by the parties concerned |
|
| Prev | Supreme Court Order 2019Ma5464 Dated September 10, 2019 ¡¼Violation of the Publishing Industry Promotion Act¡½ |
|---|---|
| Next | Supreme Court Decision 2019Da235528 Decided August 30, 2019¡¼Assigned Money¡½ |


